<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Directory Strategy Exposed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seogoat.com/dmoz-strategy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seogoat.com/dmoz-strategy/.</link>
	<description>Butt Your Path To Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:37:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Himanshu</title>
		<link>http://www.seogoat.com/dmoz-strategy/./comment-page-1#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Himanshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seogoat.com/?p=263#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I think if paid directories adopt the marketing strategy of dmoz, then they may get so much negative publicity that webmaster will refrain from spending even a dollar on them let alone mighty 300. However enforcing editorial decisions strongly is a good sign of a quality directory both for users and google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if paid directories adopt the marketing strategy of dmoz, then they may get so much negative publicity that webmaster will refrain from spending even a dollar on them let alone mighty 300. However enforcing editorial decisions strongly is a good sign of a quality directory both for users and google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
